Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41870183›Full record

ArticleEuropace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology2026

Incidence and predictors of AF recurrence during long-term follow-up of patients after PF ablation for atrial fibrillation.

Anna-Sophie Eberl, Martin Manninger, Ursula Rohrer, Laura Stix, Stefan Kurath-Koller, Katharina Gölly, Martin Benedikt, Egbert Bisping, Peter Lercher, Andreas Zirlik and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Anna-Sophie EberlDivision of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Medical University of Graz, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-1991-9899
Martin ManningerDivision of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Medical University of Graz, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-0545-4373
Ursula RohrerDivision of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Medical University of Graz, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-5278-6362
Laura StixDivision of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Medical University of Graz, Austria.ORCID 0000-0003-2529-5215
Stefan Kurath-KollerDivision of Paediatric Cardiology, Department of Paediatrics & Adolescence Medicine, Medical University of Graz, Austria.ORCID 0000-0003-3435-714X
Katharina GöllyDivision of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Medical University of Graz, Austria.ORCID 0009-0004-6157-0717
Martin BenediktDivision of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Medical University of Graz, Austria.ORCID 0000-0003-0480-2521
Egbert BispingDivision of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Medical University of Graz, Austria.
Peter LercherDivision of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Medical University of Graz, Austria.
Andreas ZirlikDivision of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Medical University of Graz, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-9971-1800
Daniel ScherrDivision of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Medical University of Graz, Austria.ORCID 0000-0001-5868-5493

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsPulsed field ablation (PFA) is an established technology for pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). However, data on long-term outcome remain scarce. With this work, we aim to contribute valuable long-term data on catheter ablation with PFA. METHODS AND

resultsWe conducted a retrospective analysis of our single-centre data of 339 patients (63% paroxysmal AF, 37% persistent AF), as well as of 55 redo procedures in patients, who underwent first PVI with a pentaspline PFA catheter. During the median follow-up (FUP) of 752 (391-1486) days, 34% patients (n = 116) experienced arrhythmia recurrence after a blanking period of 90 days, with a median time to recurrence of 218 (90-1161) days. Multivariate analysis showed electrical cardioversion at the end [HR 1.97 (95% CI 1.17-3.33), P = 0.011] and AF at the beginning of the procedure [HR 1.73 (95% CI 1.04-2.88), P = 0.034] being independently associated with a higher risk of arrhythmia recurrence. Additional anterior flower applications were protective in the univariate (P = 0.025) analysis. Atrial tachycardia (AT) was present in 16, 37, 0, and 0% after the first, second, third, and fourth procedure, respectively. In 55 analysed redo procedures, 104/221 veins (47%) were reconnected (0/1/2/3/4 reconnected veins: 9%/31%/27.3%/27.3%/5.4%). Analysis of multiple procedure outcome estimates improved long-term arrhythmia-free survival, with an overall success rate of 86% after ≥2 procedures.

conclusionPV reconnections are frequent in patients presenting for repeat ablations, especially at the anterior PV aspect. A multiple procedure approach estimates arrhythmia-free survival in 86% of patients. Procedures with additional anterior lesions at the right pulmonary veins (RPVs) could be protective for recurrences.

Indexed as

Atrial FibrillationCatheter AblationPulmonary VeinsAgedDisease-Free SurvivalFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansIncidenceIrreversible Electroporation TherapyMaleMiddle AgedMultivariate AnalysisProgression-Free SurvivalRecurrenceReoperationAblationAtrial fibrillationElectroporationPulmonary vein isolationPulsed field ablation

Identifiers

PMID41870183
PMCPMC13122355

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.