ArticleMicrobiology spectrum2026
Evaluation of the immunochromatographic assay for HTLV-1/2 detection in Gabon: genotype-specific limitations in Central Africa.
Article in Microbiology spectrum, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The human T lymphotropic virus types 1 and 2 (HTLV-1/2) are highly endemic in sub-Saharan Africa but are largely unreported. This is due to limited knowledge of HTLV-1/2 infections and a lack of suitable facilities for systematic screening. To address this, the flow immunochromatographic assay (IC) was developed for the rapid, point-of-care detection of anti-HTLV-I/II antibodies in blood samples, offering a convenient tool for improving healthcare in low-income countries. Previous reports on the IC assay have noted high specificity (up to 99.42%) and sensitivity (100%) for certain HTLV-1 strains. In this study, we assessed the performance of the IC assay using HTLV-1/2 samples from Gabon and compared its results with those obtained using two reference serological methods: enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and western blot (WB). Our findings indicate that the overall performance of the IC assay was lower with Gabon-related strains, showing a sensitivity of 66.7% (95% CI, 58.5%-74.3%) and a specificity of 99.1% (95% CI, 96.7%-99.8%). A notable variation in sensitivity was observed across different HTLV-1 genotypes: B-genotype with 73.7% sensitivity (95% CI, 61.0%-83.3%), D-genotype with 25% sensitivity (95% CI, 0.04%-0.7%), and A-genotype with 100% sensitivity (95% CI, 0.7%-100%). The IC assay also showed a positive reaction with samples of the rare F-genotype and correctly detected all eight samples related to HTLV-1-associated diseases that were tested. These results suggest that while the IC assay appears suitable for detecting A-genotypes, it has relatively lower sensitivity for the B- and D-genotypes that are common in Central Africa. Therefore, IC test outcomes, especially negative results, should be interpreted with caution in this region. IMPORTANCE: Over 5 million people in Africa are living with HTLV-1 without knowing their serological status or the potential risks of associated diseases. Contrary to other industrialized countries, where systematic HTLV-1/2 screening is implemented, HTLV-1 antibody screening appears to be totally absent in low-income countries of the African continent. Such conditions are undoubtedly due to the high cost of current HTLV-1/2 reagents and laboratory equipment needed for retrovirus screening. In this context, the newly developed lateral flow immunochromatographic assay (IC), specifically the MP Diagnostics ASSURE HTLV-I/II Rapid Test, could help not only to gain a better understanding of HTLV-1/2 epidemiology but also to improve the health care system of low-income countries. Thus, in this study, we aimed to assess the performance of this IC assay with HTLV-1/2 African genotypes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.