ArticleBriefings in bioinformatics2026
A cancer-type-aware framework for robust multimodal survival prediction under missing modalities.
Article in Briefings in bioinformatics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Despite advances in multimodal cancer prognosis, robust performance in practical settings remains hindered by three critical barriers: ubiquitous data incompleteness, failure to model cancer-specific biology, and cross-institutional instability. We address these practical challenges through a cancer-type-aware framework that uniquely combines adaptive gated fusion for missing modalities, hybrid architecture for cancer heterogeneity, and demonstrated cross-institutional robustness. By establishing histopathology as the universally available anchor modality while adaptively incorporating RNA expression and clinical text through gated fusion, our framework maintains robust performance under realistic data constraints. Evaluation across 10 The Cancer Genome Atlas cancer types demonstrated superior performance (C-indices 0.578-0.778; mean 0.670 $\pm $ 0.066), with state-of-the-art results in six cancer types. The framework maintained predictive performance under missing data scenarios, with C-indices ranging from 0.621 to 0.627 for missing RNA and from 0.568 to 0.606 for missing clinical text. Cross-institutional validation across 12-38 centers demonstrated robust cross-institutional performance (standard deviations <0.040 in eight of 10 cancer types). This methodological framework addresses key technical prerequisites-handling missing data, modeling cancer heterogeneity, and ensuring cross-institutional stability-for multimodal survival prediction, providing computational foundations necessary for future prospective clinical validation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.