ArticleJournal of microbiology & biology education2026
A CRISPR workshop series for diverse learners in Hawai'i: design, implementation, and outcomes across 3 years.
Article in Journal of microbiology & biology education, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
CRISPR genome editing has revolutionized modern biotechnology, yet access to experiential training remains limited, particularly in underrepresented and geographically isolated regions. This report describes the design, implementation, and evaluation of a CRISPR workshop series conducted over three consecutive years supported by the USDA Higher Education Challenge program and hosted at the University of Hawai'i at Mānoa. Conducted over three consecutive summers (2023-2025), the week-long, hands-on program engaged high school students, undergraduates, graduate students, educators, and community members through molecular-biology experiments, bioinformatics modules, and structured discussions on ethics and societal implications. Pre- and post-workshop assessments demonstrated significant learning gains, with mean quiz scores increasing from 58.7% to 80.2%, and all respondents (100%) reported increased confidence in genome-editing techniques. These results highlight the workshop's effectiveness in enhancing CRISPR literacy and supporting the development of scientific self-efficacy across diverse audiences. The initiative provides an adaptable workshop model and implementation guidance that other institutions can adopt to expand hands-on CRISPR training in diverse learning contexts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.