Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41870049›Full record

ArticleHealth technology assessment (Winchester, England)2026

Understanding barriers and facilitators of implementing a new assessment and bridging tool to support those at risk of repeat self-harm in prison: the qualitative RAPPS study.

Leanne Heathcote, Amanda E Perry, Ellie Thompson, Jennifer Shaw, Jane Senior, Seena Fazel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health technology assessment (Winchester, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Leanne HeathcoteCentre for Mental Health and Safety, Division of Psychology and Mental Health, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-2279-9621
Amanda E PerryHealth Sciences Department, University of York, Heslington, York, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-0279-1884
Ellie ThompsonCentre for Mental Health and Safety, Division of Psychology and Mental Health, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.ORCID 0009-0001-2840-3763
Jennifer ShawCentre for Mental Health and Safety, Division of Psychology and Mental Health, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-2569-7687
Jane SeniorCentre for Mental Health and Safety, Division of Psychology and Mental Health, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-7133-4898
Seena FazelUniversity of Oxford and NIHR Oxford Health Biomedical Research Centre, Oxford, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-5383-5365

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Rates of self-harm and suicide in prisoners in England and Wales are high, exceeding rates observed in the general population, of similar age and gender. Objective: To assess the acceptability of a new risk tool to clinicians, prison officers and people in custody, and subsequently, develop an operational implementation pathway to embed the risk tool in practice. Design: A qualitative study using action learning groups. Results: A total of five action learning groups were conducted in four male and one female prison sites. These included participation from six staff and eight people in custody. Four themes emerged from the thematic analysis, including establishing an effective implementation process, consistent administration and scoring, purposeful follow-up procedure, and meaningful engagement with people in custody. Two exemplar operational pathways were presented to identify how the risk tool could be incorporated into routine practice. Limitations: Although this qualitative study used transparent and systematic methods, our sample size was small and may not be representative. Conclusion: Suicidal thoughts, behaviours and attempts in people in prison continue to be common, and there is a need for a structured approach to reduce repetition. Action learning methods identified barriers, potential solutions and how a new tool could work alongside existing risk management. Future research should focus on the development of the exemplar pathways. In the first instance, a stakeholder working group could review the tool to make initial refinements, followed by a wider implementation study to develop the processes of how the tool could work in practice. Funding: This article presents independent research funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment programme as award number 16/159/09.

Indexed as

PrisonersPrisonsSelf-Injurious BehaviorCorrectional Facilities PersonnelEnglandFemaleHealth Services for PrisonersHumansMaleQualitative ResearchRisk AssessmentWalesPRISONPRISONERSRISK ASSESSMENTSELF-HARMSUICIDE

Identifiers

PMID41870049
PMCPMC13034088

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.