Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41869981›Full record

ReviewActa paediatrica (Oslo, Norway : 1992)2026

Can We Talk About Fetal Consciousness?

Nadja Reissland

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Acta paediatrica (Oslo, Norway : 1992), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Nadja ReisslandDepartment of Psychology, Durham University, Durham, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-4976-7117

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimThis mini-review examines research on fetal consciousness, focusing on whether it can be empirically assessed or remains primarily a philosophical construct.

methodsA review of theoretical frameworks was conducted. Behavioural evidence from studies of prenatal sensory responsiveness is evaluated, with particular attention to whether observed behaviours are reflexive or intentional actions.

resultsResearch in this area is frequently inconsistent. Theoretical models differ in how they conceptualise consciousness and in pinpointing when it may first emerge. Some frameworks propose that consciousness requires the integration of three key components: awareness, meaning the capacity to register sensory input; cognition, defined as the ability to acquire, organise and utilise information; and volition, in terms of intentional, goal-directed behaviour. Empirical findings from studies of self-directed fetal movements, behavioural responses to external stimuli, and systematic changes in fetal facial expressions following specific sensory inputs all point towards the presence of elements of conscious states rather than the alternative explanation of reflexive activity. These early capacities appear to be observable during prenatal development.

conclusionUncertainty remains regarding the extent to which fetal behaviours evidence full conscious experience. Advancing the field requires controlled experimental research and advanced technology to understand consciousness as it first emerges.

Indexed as

ConsciousnessFetusAwarenessCognitionFemaleHumansPregnancy

Identifiers

PMID41869981
PMCPMC13159773

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.