Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41869967›Full record

ArticleClinical advances in periodontics2026

Modified Neumann incision for implant placement in overdentures: Case series of a less invasive alternative.

Lucas Jardim da Silva, Laura Lourenço Morel, Luciana de Rezende Pinto, Otacílio Luiz Chagas-Júnior, Jamil Awad Shibli, Fernanda Faot

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical advances in periodontics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Lucas Jardim da SilvaGraduate Program in Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Federal University of Pelotas (UFPel), Pelotas, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0127-7832
Laura Lourenço MorelGraduate Program in Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Federal University of Pelotas (UFPel), Pelotas, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4855-311X
Luciana de Rezende PintoDepartment of Restorative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Federal University of Pelotas (UFPel), Pelotas, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0294-0488
Otacílio Luiz Chagas-JúniorDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery and Maxillofacial Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Federal University of Pelotas (UFPel), Pelotas, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.
Jamil Awad ShibliDental Research Division, Guarulhos University, Guarulhos, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1971-0195
Fernanda FaotDepartment of Restorative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Federal University of Pelotas (UFPel), Pelotas, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6889-7238

Funding

Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior - Brasil
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundConventional envelope flap techniques for implant placement in edentulous mandibles are associated with greater postoperative morbidity, especially in elderly patients or those with anatomical limitations. Minimally invasive alternatives aim to preserve soft tissues and reduce complications, enhancing clinical predictability.

methodsA clinical study was conducted with ten fully edentulous patients, in whom 20 regular implants were placed in the interforaminal region without surgical guides. A modified Neumann incision with a mesial relaxing cut and partial-thickness "L"-shaped flap was used. Digital planning was performed using free software. Surgical time, number of anesthetic tubes, adverse events, flap healing, peri-implant inflammation (PI), gingival bleeding index (GBI), and probing depth (PD) were evaluated at 14, 30, 60, and 90 days postoperatively.

resultsNo surgical complications, such as dehiscence, infection, paresthesia, or early implant loss, were observed. All patients achieved primary wound healing. The mean surgical time was 44 min (range: 25-61 min), with an average of four anesthetic tubes per patient. GBI and PD remained low throughout follow-up, with few sites showing PD ≥ 4 mm. Healing scores and inflammatory parameters progressively improved over time.

conclusionsThe modified Neumann incision with mesial relaxing cut, guided by digital planning, proved to be a safe, predictable, and minimally invasive approach for implant placement in edentulous mandibles. This technique demonstrated favorable healing, reduced surgical time, and effective PI control, making it suitable for patients with systemic fragility or anatomical challenges. KEY POINTS: The modified Neumann incision with mesial relaxing cut allows for safe and direct visualization of the mental foramen with limited flap elevation, reducing surgical trauma and preserving soft tissue integrity. This technique demonstrated favorable healing outcomes and low postoperative morbidity, even in elderly patients and anatomically challenging mandibles, without the need for physical surgical guides. Digital preoperative planning using free software enhances precision and predictability, making the approach reproducible and applicable in daily clinical practice. PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY: This study describes a new, less invasive surgical technique for placing dental implants in the lower jaw of patients who have lost all their teeth. The method, called the modified Neumann incision with a mesial relaxing cut, was tested in 10 patients who received 2 implants to support a mandibular overdenture. The technique allows the surgeon to see important anatomical structures, such as nerves, while reducing the amount of tissue that needs to be cut or lifted. Patients were followed for 3 months after surgery, and the healing process, inflammation, and peri-implant health were monitored. The results showed that all patients healed well, with no significant complications or pain, and the soft tissues around the implants remained healthy. The approach proved to be safe, efficient, and well tolerated, particularly for older adults and individuals with health conditions that increase surgical risks. This technique may help make implant treatments more comfortable and predictable for edentulous patients, although larger studies are still needed to confirm these findings.

Indexed as

Dental Implantation, EndosseousDental Prosthesis, Implant-SupportedDenture, OverlayJaw, EdentulousAgedFemaleHumansMaleMandibleMiddle AgedMinimally Invasive Surgical ProceduresOperative TimePeriodontal IndexSurgical FlapsTreatment Outcomecase seriesdental implantsdigital planninginterventionminimally invasive surgerysurgical technique

Identifiers

PMID41869967
PMCPMC13603052

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.