Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41869839›Full record

ArticleTrends in hearing

Own-Voice Perception with Different Processing Delays in Open-Fit Hearing Aids.

Borgný Súsonnudóttir, Lars D Mosgaard, Georg Stiefenhofer, Pamela E Souza, Tobias Neher

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Trends in hearing. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Borgný SúsonnudóttirDepartment of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0003-2897-7772
Lars D MosgaardORCA Labs, Lynge, Denmark.ORCID 0009-0007-5284-8555
Georg StiefenhoferWS Audiology A/S, Lynge, Denmark.
Pamela E SouzaDepartment of Communication Sciences & Disorders, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0928-3479
Tobias NeherDepartment of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-1107-9274

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In open-fit hearing aids (HAs), the interaction between the direct and processed sound leads to comb-filtering and, thus, perceived coloration effects. The magnitude of these effects depends on the level difference between the direct and processed sound and on the processing delay. A critical issue for HA uptake and use is own-voice perception, which the current study focused on. Its aims were to investigate (1) whether short processing delay is preferred over longer delays, (2) how processing delay influences different perceptual dimensions related to own-voice perception, and (3) whether spectral discrimination abilities can predict delay preference. Twenty-four individuals with mild-to-moderate hearing impairment participated. Using prototype receiver-in-the-canal HAs, processing delays of 0.5, 5, and 10 ms were compared. Delay preference was assessed using a paired-comparison task. Perceptual dimensions relating to own-voice perception were investigated using a customized version of the "Own Voice Qualities" questionnaire. Spectral discrimination abilities were assessed using a spectral ripple discrimination (SRD) task. The analyses showed that the 0.5-ms delay was preferred over the longer delays. Furthermore, the 0.5-ms delay received better ratings related to tonality perception (e.g., attributes such as

Indexed as

Auditory PerceptionCorrection of Hearing ImpairmentHearing AidsPersons with Hearing DisabilitiesSpeech PerceptionVoice QualityAcoustic StimulationAgedAged, 80 and overAuditory ThresholdDiscrimination, PsychologicalFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedProsthesis Designcomb-filteringfrequency resolutionHearing aidssound quality

Identifiers

PMID41869839
PMCPMC13009764

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.