ArticleTechnology in cancer research & treatment
Screening of Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Hepatic Cirrhosis Patients by a Novel Blood-Based Multi-Omics Test.
Article in Technology in cancer research & treatment. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
IntroductionHepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) screening in patients with hepatic cirrhosis (HC) relies on ultrasound and alpha-fetoprotein (US + AFP), which has limitations in sensitivity, particularly for early-stage HCC detection. This study aims to evaluate the performance of a novel multi-omics blood test, HCCscreen, with its individual components (methylation, AFP, Des-γ-Carboxy Prothrombin (DCP), mutations) and the standard US + AFP for HCC screening in a hepatic cirrhotic population.MethodsA total of 5078 patients with known high-risk for HCC were recruited. A prospective screening study was conducted on 650 patients with hepatic cirrhosis identified by ultrasound. Blood samples were collected from all patients before the confirmation of diagnosis by imaging and/or pathological examinations. The performance of HCCscreen, individual markers and US + AFP were calculated and compared. Statistics was performed with Graphpad Prism 5.0.ResultsHCCscreen exhibited a sensitivity of 86.3% at a specificity of 81.3%, with a positive predictive value (PPV) of 28.2% and a negative predictive value (NPV) of 98.6%. The positive likelihood ratio (LR+) was 4.61 and the negative LR (LR-) was 0.17. The positive detection rate (PDR) for all markers increased with more advanced HCC stages, whether Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) or clinical staging. Among the single-omics, methylation showed the highest PDR, followed by AFP, DCP and mutations. HCCscreen demonstrated superior overall performance with an AUC of 0.87, outperforming individual markers like methylation (AUC = 0.76), AFP (AUC = 0.83), and DCP (AUC = 0.77). Crucially, HCCscreen's PDR was significantly higher than US + AFP in early-stage HCC (BCLC-0 and clinical stage I). Furthermore, while AFP's PDR varied significantly by sex, HCCscreen's performance remained consistent across all demographics. Correlation analysis revealed a significant association only between the HCCscreen score and the methylation score.ConclusionsThe multi-omics approach of HCCscreen significantly enhances early HCC detection in patients with hepatic cirrhosis compared to both its individual components and the current standard of US + AFP. Its robust and consistent performance across patient demographics underscores its potential as a superior tool for population-wide early HCC screening.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.