Trial reportHealth expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy2026
Intervention Mapping: A Framework to Co-Design the ALAPAGE Programme to Simultaneously Improve Dietary Diversity and Physical Fitness Among Older People.
Trial report in Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05140330 (French Tittle), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
French Tittle : Recherche Visant à améliorer l'ALimentation et l'Activité Physique du Sujet AGE Vivant à Domicile - Etude ALAPAGE
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe design process of public health promotion programmes is rarely described in detail. This study aims to present the co-design process and theoretical rationale of a diet- and physical activity-promoting programme called ALAPAGE, targeting community-dwelling adults aged 60 years and older in southeastern France.
methodsThe six steps of the Intervention Mapping (IM) framework applied to the ALAPAGE programme were as follows: 1. Needs assessment: Eighteen participatory meetings with stakeholders and a literature review were conducted to identify determinants of behaviour change. 2. Identification of change objectives (immediate targets of the ALAPAGE programme). 3. Intervention theory: Based on the literature and health psychology expertise, Theory of Planned Behaviour and Goal Setting Theory were used supplemented by behaviour change techniques. These were adapted to the change objectives and translated into practical strategies. 4. Development of the ALAPAGE programme sequences. Steps 5 (implementation) and 6 (evaluation) are described in a separate article.
resultsFollowing IM, 31 change objectives were defined, adapted to 15 determinants of behaviour change (e.g., setting a personalised goal was selected as a change objective to address the determinant 'experimenting with behaviour'). Thirty practical strategies (e.g., group discussions) were organised into seven group sessions. Nineteen pedagogical tools (e.g., 24-h recall sheets) were tested in a pilot study involving 21 participants.
conclusionUsing the IM approach, the ALAPAGE programme integrates behaviour change techniques to simultaneously address determinants of diet and physical activity among seniors. PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: Professionals from partner organisations contributed to needs assessment, and programme development. Dieticians and physical activity specialists helped identify behaviour change determinants, validated the theoretical model, and participated in programme design and testing. Seniors were interviewed during the needs assessment and tested the programme sequence.
trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT05 140330, 1 December 2021, https://www. CLINICALTRIALS: gov/study/NCT05140330?titles=ALAPAGE&rank=1.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.