ArticleProceedings of the ACM on human-computer interaction2025
Can you see what I see? Examining the Impact of Smart Glasses on Communication Dynamics in Distributed Emergency Medical Teams.
Article in Proceedings of the ACM on human-computer interaction, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A cross-cultural comparison on perception for extended reality (XR) learning environmental simulation of animal drug administration.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Effective communication is critical for emergency medical teams, especially when distributed providers must collaborate under high-stakes conditions to deliver timely, life-saving care. Traditional communication tools such as radios and phones, while commonly used, are limited to audio-only exchanges-often resulting in misunderstandings, communication breakdowns, and delays in treatment. This study explores the use of smart glasses as an alternative communication tool in prehospital emergency care and examines how their use influences communication dynamics between prehospital providers (e.g., paramedics) and remote emergency physicians, compared to traditional methods (radio and phone). Through simulation-based testing, we found that smart glasses reduced communication breakdowns and facilitated more in-depth, context-rich discussions about patient care. Both EMS providers and physicians viewed the smart glass technology as a promising solution for enabling multimodal communication (e.g., visual, auditory, gestures, text). However, we also identified several challenges associated with its use in near-realistic simulation environments, including the need for overhearing capabilities, issues with visual alignment and motion-induced discomfort, extended interaction times, and concerns around autonomy and privacy. We conclude with a discussion of the design and practical implications of these findings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.