ArticleFrontiers in oncology2026
Recommendations for the treatment of endometrial cancer in settings with limited resources: report from the International Gynecological Cancer Society consensus meeting.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
38 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Given the high disparities present in cancer care worldwide and even more challenging infrastructure and access for low- and middle-income countries, adhering precisely to international guidelines has become a challenging and complex task. Recommendations from an independent multidisciplinary panel of experts from 13 countries, including medical oncologists, pathologists, surgeons, and radiation oncologists, who met during IGCS to address some of these challenges. Methods: The panel met in New York City in September of 2022 during the International Gynecological Cancer Society Congress and was composed of specialists from developing countries in Africa, Asia, Eastern Europe, Latin America, and the Middle East. The panel addressed 103 questions and provided recommendations for the management of early, locally advanced, recurrent, and/or metastatic endometrial cancer. The questions were carefully developed by the group and specifically directed to, and answered by, specialists according to their respective areas of expertise. Consensus was defined as at least 75% of the voting members selecting a particular recommendation, whereas a majority vote was considered when one option garnered between 50.0% and 74.9% of votes. Resource limitation was defined as any issues limiting access to qualified surgeons, contemporary imaging or radiation-oncology techniques, antineoplastic drugs, or funding for providing modern medical care. Results: Eighteen of the 109 (16.5%) questions presented to the panel reached consensus, whereas a majority vote was reached for 43 (39.4%) additional questions. The recommendations for the remaining questions were considerably heterogeneous and were considered experts opinion only. Conclusion: Establishing guidelines with recommendations in areas with resource limitations may help healthcare providers and improve patient care around the world.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.