SynthesisFrontiers in oncology2026
Recurrence risk prediction model for hepatitis B virus-associated hepatocellular carcinoma patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Frontiers in oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Hepatitis B virus-associated hepatocellular carcinoma (HBV-HCC) is characterized by high postoperative recurrence rates. Although numerous recurrence prediction models exist, their performance and clinical utility remain uncertain. Objective: To systematically evaluate the performance and methodological quality of existing recurrence risk prediction models for HBV-HCC patients. Methods: We searched PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, Scopus, and OVID databases. Data were extracted following the CHARMS checklist, and the PROBAST tool was used to assess the risk of bias. A meta-analysis of the C-index from validation cohorts was performed using a random-effects model. Results: A total of 22 studies, encompassing 22 models, were included. Regarding the modeling methodology, 20 models were developed using the Cox proportional hazards regression model, one used a logistic regression model, and one utilized machine learning (ML). All 22 studies exhibited a high risk of bias, predominantly originating from the analysis domain. The meta-analysis revealed a pooled C-index of 0.73 (95% CI: 0.70-0.75) in the validation cohorts. The most frequently used predictors were MVI, AFP, tumor size, tumor number, and HBV-DNA. Conclusion: Existing recurrence prediction models for HBV-HCC demonstrate moderate predictive accuracy but are universally affected by a high risk of bias. This limits their reliability and applicability in current clinical practice. Future research should emphasize methodological rigor and conduct multicenter external validation before applying models in clinical practice. Systematic Review Registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/, identifier CRD42025629973.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.