Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41869635›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of population data science2026

Global Mind Project data in the United States: A comparison with national statistics.

Joseph Taylor, Oleksii Sukhoi, Jennifer Jane Newson, Tara C Thiagarajan

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of population data science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Joseph TaylorSapien Labs, 1201 Wilson Blvd, 27th floor, Arlington, VA 22209, USA.
Oleksii SukhoiSapien Labs, 1201 Wilson Blvd, 27th floor, Arlington, VA 22209, USA.
Jennifer Jane NewsonSapien Labs, 1201 Wilson Blvd, 27th floor, Arlington, VA 22209, USA.
Tara C ThiagarajanSapien Labs, 1201 Wilson Blvd, 27th floor, Arlington, VA 22209, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The rapid growth of internet and mobile technologies has opened up new, low-cost methods for large-scale population surveys. The Global Mind Project (GMP) is one such survey that uses quota-based online strategies that dynamically target respondents by age, sex, and location. However, how well this method aligns with national population statistics remains unclear. Objective: To evaluate how well GMP data collected through online recruitment aligns demographically with United States (US) benchmarks from traditional probability-based surveys, including the American Community Survey (ACS), Household Pulse Survey (HPS), and American Trends Panel (ATP). Methods: We analysed 114,721 GMP responses collected in the US between 2020 and 2024. Participants were recruited via Facebook and Google AdSense using broad interest-based keywords and stratified demographic targeting. GMP data were time- and question-matched with ACS, HPS, and ATP data to compare trends in educational attainment, marital status, mental health treatment, and number of close friends. Results: Demographic patterns in GMP data typically aligned with national statistics within a 5-7% margin. Educational attainment by age was similar to ACS data, except among 65+, where GMP consistently showed a 5% and 10% higher rate of High School and Bachelor's completion, respectively. GMP and ACS matched near-perfectly for Divorced and Widowed marital status by age while 'Not married' in the GMP was 6-10% higher compared to 'Never married' individuals in the ACS and, conversely, lower in the Married group. GMP aggregate mental health treatment estimates were within ±1% of HPS values for three of the four years studied, although age-specific differences ranged from 5-8%. Compared to ATP, those reporting two or fewer friends were 15% higher in the GMP. These differences reflect differences in sampling methodology but also imperfect matches of categories and differing non-response bias arising from mode of survey. Conclusions: GMP data demonstrate that with dynamic targeting and quota-based sampling, online recruitment methods can produce data that align well with traditional national surveys. This data, therefore, offers real-time, inclusive and cost-efficient population-level monitoring of mental health and social trends, with potential for use in public health research and policy. Highlights: The Global Mind Project (GMP) uses quota-based dynamic online ad targeting (Q-DOAT) via Meta and Google Ads to recruit large-scale populations.Analysis of 114,721 US responses (2020-2024) showed GMP demographic trends aligned within 5-7% of national statistics from ACS, HPS, and ATP.Slight differences were observed, including 5-10% higher representation of single individuals, those with fewer close friends, and those seeking mental health treatment.GMP data demonstrate that online recruitment, combined with post-stratification, can produce data that aligns well with national demographic and social trends.The study supports the utility of GMP as a scalable, near real-time platform for population health monitoring.

Indexed as

DemographySurveys and QuestionnairesHumansInternetUnited Statesglobal mind projectmental healthmethodsMHQPopulation healthrepresentativenesssurvey

Identifiers

PMID41869635
PMCPMC13001805

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.