Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41869597›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in public health2026

AI redefine untargeted metabolomics: estimating chemical amounts for a Human Exposome Project.

Fenna C M Sillé, Karolina Kopańska, Carsten Prasse, Thomas Luechtefeld, Thomas Hartung

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Fenna C M SilléCenter for Alternatives to Animal Testing (CAAT), Department of Environmental Health and Engineering, Bloomberg School of Public Health and Whiting School of Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, United States.
Karolina KopańskaCenter for Alternatives to Animal Testing (CAAT), Department of Environmental Health and Engineering, Bloomberg School of Public Health and Whiting School of Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, United States.
Carsten PrasseDepartment of Environmental Health and Engineering, Bloomberg School of Public Health and Whiting School of Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, United States.
Thomas LuechtefeldCenter for Alternatives to Animal Testing (CAAT), Department of Environmental Health and Engineering, Bloomberg School of Public Health and Whiting School of Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, United States.
Thomas HartungCenter for Alternatives to Animal Testing (CAAT), Department of Environmental Health and Engineering, Bloomberg School of Public Health and Whiting School of Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, United States.

Funding

NEXUS: Network for Exposomics in the U.S.U24ES036819 · NIEHS · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI Rima Habre, GARY W MILLER · 2024 to 2026
$4.6M
NIEHS NIH HHS U24 ES036819
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Human Exposome Project aims to map the totality of environmental exposures, but its success relies on transforming qualitative detections into quantitative data. Following our review on AI-driven metabolite identification, this second installment addresses the next critical bottleneck: estimating chemical concentrations in untargeted metabolomics without authentic standards. Translating LC-HRMS signal intensities into absolute concentrations is hindered by the vast variability in ionization efficiency and matrix effects, particularly for xenobiotics where reference standards are unavailable. We review emerging strategies that leverage artificial intelligence-ranging from descriptor-based regression to deep learning on molecular point clouds-to predict ionization response factors. We further evaluate a "matrix-embedded" calibration approach that utilizes ubiquitous endogenous metabolites (e.g., amino acids, lipids) as internal anchors to normalize response scales across studies. These innovations enable "tiered semi-quantification," allowing the classification of exposures into biologically relevant ranges (e.g., nanomolar vs. micromolar). This stratification facilitates direct integration with toxicological frameworks, such as the Threshold of Toxicological Concern (TTC) and high-throughput bioactivity data (e.g., ToxCast), for rapid risk prioritization. By integrating quantitative AI prediction models with robust quality assurance, untargeted metabolomics can evolve from a qualitative discovery tool into a quantitative engine for exposure science, providing the necessary evidence to link complex chemical exposures to human health outcomes.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceEnvironmental ExposureExposomeMetabolomicsHumansartificial intelligenceconcentration predictionexposomicsHuman Exposome Projectionization efficiencyquantitative structure–retention relationshipsThreshold of Toxicological Concern (TTC)untargeted metabolomics

Identifiers

PMID41869597
PMCPMC13001115

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.