ArticleJournal of wrist surgery2026
Anatomical Fit of the Volar Locking Plate for Distal Radius and Influence of the Plate Size.
Article in Journal of wrist surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: The volar locking plates (VLPs) for distal radius fractures are currently available in different shapes and size options. Therefore, we investigated whether the anatomical fit and plate size of VLPs affect their proper placement. Materials and Methods: Two sizes of Acu-Loc2 Proximal Plates (AcuLoc), three sizes of Variable Angle LCP Two-Column Volar Distal Radius Plate 2.4 (VALCP), and 16 formalin-fixed cadaver specimens were studied. Computed tomography scans were performed on both the plates and forearms. The plate was fixed to a radius, and radiographs were obtained using fluoroscopy. X-rays were superimposed, and a three-dimensional image of the plate and bone was created. The distance from the plate to the bone (PBD) was measured, and the contact area between the bone and plate was analyzed. We measured the distance between the distal end of the plate and the watershed line, defining it as watershed overlap. Results: The PBD in the radial column was significantly smaller than that in the ulnar column in the narrow and standard VALCP, as well as in the narrow AcuLoc. For the other plates, it tended to be smaller in the radial column than in the ulnar column. The contact area on the plate was small, and the average value of the watershed overlap was negative for both plates. However, no significant differences in each measurement item were observed among the plate sizes. Conclusion: Although the small plate size affected the fitting to the distal radius, the variance was minimal; therefore, each plate size may be selected depending on the circumstances of the fracture. Level of Evidence: Diagnostic Level III.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.