ArticleJournal of wrist surgery2026
Outcomes after Acute Perilunate Injuries: A Single-Center Experience Over 30 Years.
Article in Journal of wrist surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A 4-Anchor Suture Tape Internal Bracing Technique for Ligamentous Perilunate Injuries.Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. Global research & reviews · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Perilunate fracture-dislocations represent a spectrum of devastating wrist injuries. They typically involve high-energy mechanisms, occur in young patients and are relatively uncommon. Our current knowledge on this rare wrist pathology is limited as most studies involve small retrospective case series and limited follow-up. Purpose: The purpose of this study was to examine the functional, radiographic, and patient reported outcomes after perilunate injuries and evaluate surgical practice trends over time. Materials and Methods: A retrospective review identified 123 patients who had open reduction and internal fixation of an acute perilunate injury at a single academic centre over a 30-year study period. Post-operative functional, patient-reported, and radiographic outcomes were assessed. The association of various surgical and injury-related variables on outcomes was examined using independent Results: Fourty-seven patients participated with a mean follow-up of 14 years. All patients underwent urgent or semi-urgent operative intervention with a dorsal or combined approach. At final follow-up, mean patient-rated wrist evaluation score was 24.2, visual analogue scale pain score was 2.4, flexion-extension arc was 56% of the contralateral side and grip strength was 76%. Patients who underwent re-operation or injured their dominant hand had worse outcomes. Only 9% of patients were unable to return to their same job or a similar job as a result of their injury. Conclusions: Overall, patients retain a relatively high level of function and report low pain scores long-term after perilunate injuries. Multi-centre, prospective studies are required going forward.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.