ArticleNational science review2026
A tailored MoS
Article in National science review, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Enhanced Antibiotics Sieving by Exfoliated TiSNano-micro letters · 2026Article
- High efficiency gold extraction by 2D metallic 1T/1T' phase transition metal dichalcogenides.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Spatiotemporal Dynamics of Micropropagules in Seawater During the 2020 Green Tide Outbreak in the Southern Yellow Sea.Biology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Active environmental DNA (eDNA) sampling, typically involving water filtration, offers the advantage of capturing relatively high concentrations of eDNA, making it particularly valuable in aquatic environments with low DNA concentrations. However, this approach faces several limitations, including low DNA-capture efficiency, limited molecular selectivity and the risk of contamination during filtration and handling. Moreover, commonly used membrane materials often lack strong and specific DNA-binding affinity, which reduces detection sensitivity and compromises biodiversity assessment. To address these challenges, we developed a MoS
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.