ArticleCureus2026
Evaluation of a Community-Based Student-Led Health Equity Curriculum.
Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background The Community Perspectives in Medicine (CPIM) elective at Weill Cornell Medical College was developed to address curricular gaps in teaching social determinants of health (SDOH). The course connects first-year students with community-based organizations and health justice topics through interactive sessions. In 2023, CPIM was redesigned to emphasize nationally debated health justice issues and to include a community engagement project. This study evaluated the redesigned course's impact on students' knowledge, confidence, and advocacy skills. Methodology Students attended seven weekly one-hour lectures led by community health advocates, each followed by a 30-minute student-led discussion. Students completed a community engagement project with a local organization and presented their experiences in the final session. Pre- and post-course surveys assessed confidence in course topics and intent to incorporate advocacy into future practice using a five-point Likert scale. Differences were analyzed with Wilcoxon rank-sum tests. Qualitative feedback captured perceived impact and key learning themes. Results In 2023, confidence ratings increased significantly from 2.71 to 4.69 on a five-point scale (p < 0.001), with the greatest gains in understanding single-payer healthcare. In 2024, ratings increased from 2.62 to 3.72 (p < 0.001), with the largest improvement in understanding political advocacy in medicine. Qualitative responses highlighted enhanced motivation to pursue advocacy and stronger connections to marginalized communities. Conclusions CPIM effectively increases students' confidence in engaging with SDOH and advocacy. Its success highlights its potential as a model for integrating community-centered, justice-focused education into medical training.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.