ReviewCureus2026
RNA-Based Therapies for Hypercholesterolemia and Coronary Artery Disease.
Review in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
RNA-based therapies have emerged as a transformative approach in the management of hypercholesterolemia and coronary artery disease by directly targeting molecular pathways involved in lipid regulation. These treatments focus on silencing key genes such as PCSK9, ANGPTL3, ApoB, and Lp(a), achieving substantial reductions in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), triglycerides, and other atherogenic lipoproteins. Small interfering RNA (siRNA) and antisense oligonucleotides (ASOs) provide highly specific post-transcriptional gene suppression, while advances in chemical stabilization and GalNAc conjugation have enhanced hepatocyte delivery and prolonged therapeutic action. Approved agents such as inclisiran demonstrate sustained LDL-C reductions of approximately 50% with only two to three injections annually, improving adherence and offering an alternative for patients intolerant to statins or unable to reach lipid targets with conventional therapy. Pelacarsen and other emerging antisense therapies show promise for reducing lipoprotein(a), an independent cardiovascular risk factor, while siRNAs targeting ANGPTL3 offer prolonged lipid-lowering effects beyond those achieved with monoclonal antibodies. Despite these advantages, challenges remain. Hepatic safety concerns have halted the development of some agents, such as vupanorsen, and long-term cardiovascular outcome data for several therapies, including inclisiran, are still in development. Cost and accessibility also limit broad adoption, emphasizing the need for cost-effective strategies and long-term surveillance. Nevertheless, current evidence supports the integration of RNA-based therapies into modern lipid-lowering algorithms, particularly for high-risk patients, while ongoing research continues to refine delivery systems, enhance safety, and expand therapeutic indications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.