Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41869179›Full record

ArticleCureus2026

Chemotherapy and the Skin: Understanding Dermatologic Side Effects.

Pooja Unnikrishnan, Kirankanth Vudayana, Sanjana Diddi, Usha Sri Akkineni, Vunnava Sri Koulini, Chakka Gayathri

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Pooja UnnikrishnanDermatology, Venereology and Leprosy, Great Eastern Medical School and Hospital, Srikakulam, IND.
Kirankanth VudayanaDermatology, Venereology and Leprosy, Great Eastern Medical School and Hospital, Srikakulam, IND.
Sanjana DiddiDermatology, Venereology and Leprosy, Great Eastern Medical School and Hospital, Srikakulam, IND.
Usha Sri AkkineniDermatology, Venereology and Leprosy, Great Eastern Medical School and Hospital, Srikakulam, IND.
Vunnava Sri KouliniDermatology, Venereology and Leprosy, Great Eastern Medical School and Hospital, Srikakulam, IND.
Chakka GayathriDermatology, Venereology and Leprosy, Great Eastern Medical School and Hospital, Srikakulam, IND.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background Chemotherapy-induced cutaneous adverse drug reactions (cADRs) represent a frequent and clinically significant component of treatment-related toxicity in oncology. These reactions may range from mild, self-limiting eruptions to more severe presentations capable of compromising patient comfort, adherence to therapy, and overall quality of life. Their clinical heterogeneity reflects variations in drug class, cumulative exposure, and individual susceptibility. Given the increasing use of combination regimens and targeted therapies, systematic characterization of cADRs remains essential for optimizing supportive care and minimizing treatment interruptions. Materials and methods This prospective observational descriptive case series (referral-based cohort) study, which included 30 patients who developed cADRs following administration of single-agent or combination chemotherapy and were subsequently referred from the oncology ward to the dermatology outpatient department (OPD) at a tertiary care center over a one-year period. Demographic, clinical, and treatment-related variables were documented, including latency, morphology, distribution, and severity grading using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 5.0. Skin biopsies were performed when clinically indicated. Management strategies and clinical outcomes were recorded. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize the data. Results Breast carcinoma (33.3%) and gastrointestinal (GI) cancers (23.3%) were the most common underlying malignancies. Taxanes (26.6%), platinum compounds (23.3%), and antimetabolites (20%) accounted for the majority of implicated agents. Predominant cADRs included hand-foot syndrome (HFS) (20%), maculopapular eruptions (16.6%), alopecia (16.6%), nail changes (13.3%), infusion-related urticaria (10%), and pigmentary alterations (6.6%). Most reactions were classified as CTCAE Grade I or II, with only three patients (10%) demonstrating Grade III toxicity. Supportive dermatologic care resulted in favorable outcomes for the majority, and although 20% required temporary dose modification, no patient required permanent cessation of chemotherapy. Conclusion Chemotherapy-induced cADRs encompass a broad clinical spectrum, with most reactions being mild to moderate and amenable to timely supportive interventions. Recognition of drug-specific cutaneous patterns and early dermatologic involvement can reduce morbidity, support treatment continuity, and enhance patient satisfaction. Strengthening collaborative care pathways between oncology and dermatology serves an important role in improving overall patient outcomes during systemic cancer therapy.

Indexed as

antimetabolite-induced toxicitychemotherapycutaneous adverse drug reactionshand–foot syndromemaculopapular eruptiontaxane-induced reactions

Identifiers

PMID41869179
PMCPMC13004420

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.