ArticleCureus2026
A Case Report of General Anesthesia for Abdominal Surgery in Severe Cavitary Tuberculosis: Strategies to Minimize Barotrauma.
Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A 37-year-old man with suspected tuberculosis and severe cavitary lung disease presented with an acute abdomen with pneumoperitoneum requiring emergent exploratory laparotomy. The patient presented with dysphagia, recurrent regurgitation, pancytopenia, treatment refractory elevated International Normalized Ratio (INR). His compromised respiratory status, likely to worsen under positive pressure ventilation, along with a high risk of aspiration of gastric content and coagulopathy during emergent abdominal surgery, required general anesthesia. In patients with extensive pulmonary tuberculosis and large lung cavernous lesions, general anesthesia increases the risks of dissemination of the disease, barotrauma, and impaired gas exchange, all of which may lead to respiratory failure. Available literature is scarce and focuses on employing regional anesthesia and avoiding mechanical ventilation whenever possible. Our plan included taking the patient to a negative pressure room with limited personnel wearing individual protective equipment; performing videolaryngoscopy with maintained adequate respiratory drive and endotracheal intubation under sedation and topical anesthesia of the vocal cords; careful titration of pressure support for normocapnia and normoxemia. Throughout surgery, peak pressures and respiratory mechanics were continuously monitored, and the patient maintained lung-protective tidal volumes and low airway pressures. He was successfully extubated in the operating room; no respiratory support was necessary in the postoperative period. By adapting available techniques to prioritize patient safety, general anesthesia with preserved spontaneous ventilation proved to be a viable and effective alternative when conventional approaches posed a significant risk. This strategy may be a safe option for similar patients undergoing open abdominal procedures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.