Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41869133›Full record

ArticleCureus2026

Rescue Saline Washout for Popliteal Sciatic Block.

Viet Scott C Nguyen, Joseph E Villaluz, William Mitchell

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Viet Scott C NguyenAnesthesiology, University of California, Irvine (UCI) Medical Center, Orange, USA.
Joseph E VillaluzAnesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, University of California, Irvine (UCI) Health, Orange, USA.
William MitchellAnesthesia and Critical Care, University of California, Irvine (UCI), Irvine, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Rescue saline washouts have been reported to reverse the effects of local anesthetic blockade in interscalene blocks and epidurals; however, evidence for their use in lower-extremity blocks is limited. This case report discusses a scenario in which a 73-year-old, 62.4 kg, female patient received an ultrasound-guided preoperative popliteal sciatic nerve block for lower extremity surgery. Subsequently, due to unforeseen circumstances, the case was cancelled, and thus the effects of the block were no longer desired. The patient wished to return home but required motor function at that time. To preserve motor function, a normal saline washout was performed at the same popliteal sciatic level under ultrasound guidance (Sonosite, Bothell, Washington). Administration of normal saline using an echogenic needle (Pajunk, Geisingen, Germany) was associated with some return of sensory function as early as 30 minutes after rescue and of motor function at three hours post-washout. This case suggests the plausibility of using a known technique, such as saline washout, to reverse the effects of nerve blockades in the setting of popliteal sciatic blocks.

Indexed as

nerve blockperipheral nerve block analgesiapopliteal sciaticregional anesthesiologysaline lavage

Identifiers

PMID41869133
PMCPMC13002127

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.