ReviewCureus2026
Assisted Dying, Pharmacological Lethality, and Suicide Risk Among Healthcare Workers: Ethical, Regulatory, and Mental Health Dimensions.
Review in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The intersection of assisted dying and suicides among healthcare workers presents a complex and multifaceted challenge, blending ethical, regulatory, and mental health considerations. This manuscript explores the bipolar association between these two phenomena, focusing on how healthcare professionals, particularly those with access to potent pharmacological agents, navigate the fine line between assisted dying in clinical settings and the alarming trend of suicides within the medical community. The ethical dilemmas posed by medical assistance in dying (MAiD) protocols are examined, including the responsibilities of healthcare providers, the delicate balance of patient autonomy versus societal norms, and the safeguarding of vulnerable populations. In parallel, the manuscript delves into the concerning rise of suicides among healthcare workers, often exacerbated by workplace stress, mental health challenges, and easy access to lethal medications. Recent post-pandemic data highlight moral injury, workforce attrition, and expanding MAiD eligibility criteria as emerging stressors that may further compound suicide risk among healthcare professionals. A detailed analysis of pharmacological agents commonly used in both MAiD and suicides highlights the regulatory measures needed to prevent misuse. Case studies illustrate the overlap between assisted dying and healthcare worker suicides, offering insights into the psychological, emotional, and systemic pressures faced by medical professionals. The manuscript calls for stronger mental health support systems within the healthcare community and advocates for regulatory reforms to ensure that assisted dying protocols are not exploited. Ultimately, it emphasizes the need for a nuanced approach to both assisted dying and healthcare worker suicide prevention, promoting ethical frameworks that respect patient rights while protecting the mental well-being of those who provide care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.