Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41869097›Full record

ArticleCureus2026

Bilateral Accessory Plantaris Muscles With Variant Origins and Insertions: A Case Report.

Christian M Furno, Jack W Kauffman, Vhuthuhawe Madzinge

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Christian M FurnoDepartment of Biology and Chemistry, Liberty University, Lynchburg, USA.
Jack W KauffmanDepartment of Biology and Chemistry, Liberty University, Lynchburg, USA.
Vhuthuhawe MadzingeDepartment of Biology and Chemistry, Liberty University, Lynchburg, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The plantaris muscle typically originates at the lower portion of the lateral supracondylar line of the femur and oblique popliteal ligament of the knee joint and inserts medial to the Achilles tendon at the calcaneal tuberosity. Functionally, this muscle is unclear, as it could be for proprioception of the leg or flexion of the knee and ankle. Additionally, it is absent in some individuals. If present, the tendon is often mistaken for the tibial nerve, which is why it is known as the "fool's nerve." This case study involves the discovery of a bilateral plantaris muscle duplication in an 88-year-old Japanese woman during a routine cadaveric dissection. This deviates from the more common unilateral presence of an accessory plantaris muscle that is predominantly reported in previous studies. Additionally, both the accessory origin and insertion differ between the two. The right accessory muscle belly originated lateral to the primary, and the tendon terminated in the tendon of the lateral head of the gastrocnemius. Conversely, the left accessory muscle belly originated superomedial to the primary muscle, where the corresponding tendon terminated in the tendon of the medial head of the gastrocnemius. Anatomical variations, including duplication, of the plantaris muscle remain an area of ongoing research due to its clinical relevance with Achilles tendinopathy, tendon grafts, and surgeries. This case reports bilateral asymmetrical accessory plantaris muscles and tendons, which can alert physicians to avoid anesthetic complications when performing popliteal or tibial nerve blocks.

Indexed as

accessory plantaris muscleachilles tendinopathybilateral variationfool's nervenerve blockplantaris muscleplantaris tendonvariant origin and insertion

Identifiers

PMID41869097
PMCPMC13005693

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.