Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41869078›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of pharmaceutics: X2026

Feasibility study on the impact of mechanical recycling on the extractables profile and toxicologic safety assessment of small-scale polycarbonate bioreactors.

Janice Zitoun, Jannik Dippel, Ina Pahl, Magali Barbaroux, Armin Hauk

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of pharmaceutics: X, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Janice ZitounSartorius Stedim Biotech GmbH, Corporate Research, August-Spindler-Strasse 11, 37079 Göttingen, Germany.
Jannik DippelSartorius Stedim Biotech GmbH, Corporate Research, August-Spindler-Strasse 11, 37079 Göttingen, Germany.
Ina PahlSartorius Stedim Biotech GmbH, Corporate Research, August-Spindler-Strasse 11, 37079 Göttingen, Germany.
Magali BarbarouxSartorius Stedim FMT S.A.S., Corporate Research ZI des Paluds, 108 Avenue du Dirigeable, 13400 Aubagne, France.
Armin HaukSartorius Stedim Biotech GmbH, Corporate Research, August-Spindler-Strasse 11, 37079 Göttingen, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The use of recycled plastics in the pharmaceutical industry raises safety questions, especially with regards to leaching substances that could compromise patient safety. This feasibility study evaluates the impact of mechanical recycling on the profile of extractables and the toxicological safety of small-scale polycarbonate bioreactors, using post-industrial polycarbonate as a model. Both new and recycled polycarbonate granules and bioreactor vessels were analyzed for extractable substances using chromatographic methods. Key results include the identification of polycarbonate degradation products, which showed a slight increase in concentration after recycling. The study also found adhesive residues from bioreactor manufacturing and degradation products, with no significant accumulation of potentially harmful substances found during recycling. Model safety assessments, including patient exposure calculations and cellular toxicity assessments, showed that recycled polycarbonate poses minimal toxicological risk under worst-case scenarios. The findings support the possibility of recycling polycarbonate for pharmaceutical applications and highlight the need for strict guidelines to ensure patient safety while promoting sustainable practices.

Indexed as

ExtractablesPolycarbonateRecyclingSafety assessment

Identifiers

PMID41869078
PMCPMC13000528

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.