ReviewShoulder & elbow2026
Soft tissue reconstruction techniques for irreparable anterosuperior rotator cuff tears: A systematic review of clinical outcomes.
Review in Shoulder & elbow, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Irreparable anterosuperior (AS) rotator cuff tears involving the subscapularis and supraspinatus cause significant shoulder dysfunction, instability, and pain. Surgical options such as pectoralis major (PM), pectoralis minor (Pm), and latissimus dorsi (LD) transfers aim to restore shoulder biomechanics, but the optimal technique remains uncertain. This systematic review evaluated clinical outcomes of soft tissue reconstruction for irreparable AS tears. Methods: Following PRISMA guidelines, Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, Emcare, and PubMed were searched. Eligible studies included randomized trials, cohort studies, and case series (≥10 patients). Methodological quality was assessed using the MINORS criteria. Results: Eight studies (350 patients) evaluating PM, Pm, LD, and combined latissimus dorsi-teres major (LDTM) transfers were included. Pm and LD transfers demonstrated the lowest failure (1.0%, 0%) and complication rates (0%, 5.6%). PM and LDTM transfers showed higher failure (12.2%) and complication rates (13.5%, 1.6%). All techniques improved patient-reported outcomes. Improvements in range of motion were most consistent in shoulder elevation, while rotational gains were smaller and variably reported. Conclusion: Soft tissue reconstruction for irreparable AS rotator cuff tears is associated with improved clinical outcomes. Pm and LD transfers appear to offer a favorable balance of functional improvement and safety, although study heterogeneity limits definitive comparison.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.