ArticleAdvanced biomedical research2026
Dose Prediction Deep Learning-Based Model for VMAT of Prostate Cancer Applying Magnetic Resonance Image (MRI) in Versa HD Linear Accelerator.
Article in Advanced biomedical research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Prostate cancer patients are commonly undergoing Radiotherapy (RT) and treatment planning system have a prominent role for dose calculation, while this would seem that dose distribution uncertainties of treatment planning system (TPS) may effect on RT results. Therefore, this study aimed to design a Dose prediction deep learning-based model for prostate cancer volumetric arc therapy (VMAT) applying MRI in Versa HD linear accelerator (linac). Materials and Methods: In this work, MRI of 45 patients who underwent VMAT was acquired, and cycle-consistent GAN (CycleGAN) (that allow image-to-image translation) and U-net deep learning (DL) framework for prostate were employed. The synthetic CT (sCT) images were generated from MR images. The predicted dose among CycleGAN, U-net and Monaco TPS (that calculate dose distribution based on CT simulation images) was compared to each other. Results: The sCT that was generated employing CycleGAN illustrated more obvious boundaries than the sCT of U-net (sCTU-net). The gamma passing rate of cycleGAN and U-net was exceeded 97% and 90%, respectively, in all areas. Conclusion: The results of this study illustrates that deep learning models including CycleGAN and U-net are good alternative for dose prediction of VMAT in Versa HD linac, while it seems that CycleGAN may be more accurate compared to U-net.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.