ArticleMental health & prevention2025
Using network analysis to identify risk and protective factors for mental health in LGBTQ+ youth.
Article in Mental health & prevention, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Objective: Youth with marginalized gender and sexual identities, or lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer, and/or questioning youth (LGBTQ+) are at heightened risk for mental health concerns due to oppressive social contexts. To guide clinical practice and address health disparities for LGBTQ+ youth, researchers must identify central and influential risk and protective factors that have the greatest potential to affect mental health. Method: Network analysis was used to model the complex relationships between risk factors, protective factors, mental health, and personal identities (gender, sexual, and racial and ethnic identities) among LGBTQ+ youth in a large statewide cross-sectional dataset from Minnesota (N = 24,400, Results: The three grade networks were similar in density and overall pattern of centrality metrics. Bias-based bullying variables, regardless of grade, and three substance use variables were central nodes across networks. School safety and empowerment were the protective factor variables with the highest expected influence values. Conclusions: Results indicate that bias-based bullying has a significant impact on mental health and other risk factors, replicating previous studies. Implications for prevention of mental health concerns include reducing bias-based bullying and substance use, the importance of early and accurate identification of mental health concerns, and increasing protective factors early on.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.