ArticleFrontiers in rehabilitation sciences2026
Outdoor bicycle training following stroke: protocol development, feasibility testing and application guidelines.
Article in Frontiers in rehabilitation sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The benefits of cycling on health have been extensively shown and indoor cycling is increasingly used as physical activity in stroke rehabilitation. However, standardized protocols and guidelines for outdoor bicycle training are still lacking for this population. Aims: To develop a structured, group-based training protocol for outdoor cycling skills in individuals with post-stroke hemiparesis and to test the feasibility of the training protocol in individuals with stroke. Methods: Based on existing literature, guidelines for other populations and the team's expertise, a training protocol and progression criteria were generated. Participants: Subsequently, five stroke participants engaged in the three-week bicycle training program that involved nine sessions (three sessions/week). Feasibility was assessed by documenting adherence, progression, adverse events, acceptability of the intervention, as well as the limited efficacy of the intervention on participant's cycling goals [Goal Attainment Scale (GAS)], self-reported confidence in cycling skills (CCS), participation in leisure (Nottingham Leisure Questionnaire) and other balance and mobility outcomes. Results: A detailed intervention protocol initially comprising of three modules of increasing complexity and that was extended to four modules to accommodate participants' rapid progression was developed. Participants completed two to four modules, showed high intervention adherence and acceptability, and minimal adverse events. Post-intervention, significant improvements in GAS ( Conclusions: This manuscript presents the first, openly available stroke-specific training protocol for outdoor cycling. Findings suggest that the intervention is feasible and acceptable, and that it improves outdoor cycling proficiency.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.