ReviewAmerican journal of translational research2026
Controversies surrounding posterior cervical laminoplasty for cervical spondylotic myelopathy with kyphotic deformity.
Review in American journal of translational research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Posterior cervical laminoplasty is a well-established surgical treatment for multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM). However, its application in patients with concomitant cervical kyphotic deformity remains a subject of significant debate and controversy. This review aims to critically examine and synthesize the current evidence surrounding key controversies in the use of laminoplasty for CSM with kyphosis. Specifically, it focuses on: (1) the ongoing debates regarding surgical indications and approach selection criteria, including the roles of cervical alignment (both global and segmental), spinal canal occupancy ratio, and the K-line; (2) the comparative safety profile of posterior versus anterior decompression; (3) the impact of the procedure on postoperative cervical sagittal balance and the risk factors for alignment loss; and (4) the relationship between preoperative cervical alignment and the development of postoperative axial symptoms. The evidence synthesized suggests that mild kyphosis may not preclude successful outcomes with laminoplasty, provided that meticulous patient selection is performed based on a comprehensive assessment of radiographic and clinical factors. Future studies should incorporate dynamic imaging, long-term follow-up, and refined biomechanical models to clarify decompression mechanisms and optimize surgical decision making for this complex patient population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.