Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41868951›Full record

ReviewAmerican journal of translational research2026

Controversies surrounding posterior cervical laminoplasty for cervical spondylotic myelopathy with kyphotic deformity.

Yikai Yao, Weiyu Jiang

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in American journal of translational research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Yikai YaoNingbo Joint Training Base, Zhejiang Chinese Medical University Hangzhou 310053, Zhejiang, China.
Weiyu JiangDepartment of Spine Surgery, Ningbo No.6 Hospital Ningbo 315040, Zhejiang, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Posterior cervical laminoplasty is a well-established surgical treatment for multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM). However, its application in patients with concomitant cervical kyphotic deformity remains a subject of significant debate and controversy. This review aims to critically examine and synthesize the current evidence surrounding key controversies in the use of laminoplasty for CSM with kyphosis. Specifically, it focuses on: (1) the ongoing debates regarding surgical indications and approach selection criteria, including the roles of cervical alignment (both global and segmental), spinal canal occupancy ratio, and the K-line; (2) the comparative safety profile of posterior versus anterior decompression; (3) the impact of the procedure on postoperative cervical sagittal balance and the risk factors for alignment loss; and (4) the relationship between preoperative cervical alignment and the development of postoperative axial symptoms. The evidence synthesized suggests that mild kyphosis may not preclude successful outcomes with laminoplasty, provided that meticulous patient selection is performed based on a comprehensive assessment of radiographic and clinical factors. Future studies should incorporate dynamic imaging, long-term follow-up, and refined biomechanical models to clarify decompression mechanisms and optimize surgical decision making for this complex patient population.

Indexed as

Cervical laminoplastycervical spondylotic myelopathycontroversieskyphotic deformitysurgical outcomes

Identifiers

PMID41868951
PMCPMC13000846

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.