ArticleAmerican journal of translational research2026
Effects of comprehensive nursing intervention on the postoperative gastrointestinal function and complications in patients undergoing endoscopic polypectomy.
Article in American journal of translational research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Effects of comprehensive nursing intervention on the postoperative gastrointestinal function and complications in patients undergoing endoscopic polypectomy.American journal of translational research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThis study aimed to investigate the effect of comprehensive nursing intervention on postoperative gastrointestinal function and complications in patients undergoing endoscopic polypectomy.
methodsThis study was a prospective randomized controlled trial (The name of the registry of clinical trial: the impact of comprehensive nursing intervention on the postoperative gastrointestinal function and complications in patients undergoing endoscopic polypectomy; clinical triathe trial number: ChiCTR2000034984; the trial URL: https://www.chictr.org.cn/index.html). 77 patients were randomly divided into a control group (
resultsAfter nursing interventions, the experimental group showed significant improvements across multiple metrics compared to the control group (all P<0.05). Key findings included reductions in inflammatory markers (procalcitonin, C-reactive protein, interleukin-17), faster postoperative recovery (shorter times to bowel sound recovery, first exhaust, and first bowel movement, and hospitalization), and lower clinical risks (VTE and fall scores, total incidence rate of adverse reactions and postoperative complications, and recurrence rate of polyps). Concurrently, the experimental group exhibited enhanced nutritional status (higher albumin and hemoglobin levels), improved gastric physiology (elevated pepsinogen I [PGI], PGI/PGII ratio, and lower PGII and gastrin-17), and superior patient-reported outcomes (general comfort questionnaire and gastrointestinal quality of life index scores), and nursing evaluations (quality and satisfaction).
conclusionsComprehensive nursing intervention could promote the recovery of gastrointestinal function in patients undergoing endoscopic polypectomy, and reduce the occurrence rate of postoperative complications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.