ArticleAnnals of gastroenterology
Diffusion-weighted imaging increases the diagnostic performance of magnetic resonance imaging in assessing rectal cancer T stage and reduces intra- and interobserver variability.
Article in Annals of gastroenterology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Accurate preoperative staging is pivotal in guiding rectal cancer treatment, and in particular for selecting appropriate neoadjuvant therapies and surgical approaches. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) remains the standard modality for local staging. However, it has some limitations, particularly in tumors at intermediate clinical stages. Recent evidence has shown that incorporating diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) can improve diagnostic performance, although its role in T staging has not been completely elucidated. Methods: The diagnostic performance of conventional MRI alone vs. MRI plus DWI in rectal cancer staging was retrospectively evaluated. The correlation between preoperative MRI findings and postoperative histopathological staging was examined. Intra- and interobserver agreement among radiologists with various levels of experience were assessed, both with and without DWI. Results: DWI-MRI improved staging accuracy, particularly for T2 and T3 tumors. The sensitivity and specificity for T2 staging increased from 68% and 96% (MRI alone) to 91% and 98% (DWI-MRI), respectively, while the sensitivity and specificity for T3 staging improved from 91% to 97%, and from 78% to 92%, respectively. The intraobserver agreement increased from 90.60% to 94.02% in experienced readers, and from 81.2% to 87.18% in less experienced ones. The interobserver agreement for DWI-MRI increased from 83.76% to 88.03%. Conclusions: DWI-MRI can enhance the accuracy of rectal cancer T staging, particularly when assessing rectal wall invasion, and it reduces overstaging. Moreover, it improves diagnostic consistency among radiologists, regardless of experience. Hence, the routine integration of DWI into preoperative MRI protocols can optimize clinical decision-making and treatment planning.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.