Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41868868›Full record

ArticleAnnals of gastroenterology

Machine learning in predicting treatment response and remission in inflammatory bowel disease: a systematic review.

Sheza Malik, Renisha Redij, Dushyant Singh Dahiya, Chengu Niu, Douglas G Adler

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of gastroenterology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Sheza MalikGastroenterology and Hepatology, Emory University Hospital, Atlanta, Georgia, USA (Sheza Malik, Chengu Niu).
Renisha RedijInternal Medicine, Trinity Health Livonia Hospital, Michigan, USA (Renisha Redij).
Dushyant Singh DahiyaGastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Kansas, Kansas City, Kansas, USA (Dushyant Singh Dahiya).
Chengu NiuGastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Nebraska, Omaha, Nebraska, USA (Chengu Niu).
Douglas G AdlerGastroneterology and Hepatology, Center for Advanced Therapeutic Endoscopy, Centura Health, Denver, Colorado, USA (Douglas G. Adler).

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The heterogeneity of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) and its unpredictable course have always been a challenge for gastroenterologists, with regard to predicting the disease response using endoscopic techniques. Machine learning (ML) models have shown some early promise in predicting treatment response in IBD patients. Methods: We conducted a systematic review of studies investigating the application of ML to predict treatment response and remission in IBD patients. We used the CHARMS checklist for data extraction. Bias was assessed with the PROBAST tool. Results: We included in our review 6 studies that evaluated numbers of IBD patients ranging from 67 to 3004. ML models demonstrated low to moderate predictive accuracy for treatment response and remission (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve: 0.489-0.811; sensitivity: 0.46-0.96; specificity: 0.56-0.98). The studies that utilized ML models with more input variables performed better. Furthermore, only 2 studies performed external validation, and half of the studies demonstrated a substantial risk of bias due to missing data/overfitting, and variability in outcome definition. Conclusions: ML models show considerable promise in predicting treatment outcomes and remission in IBD. However, given the substantial bias in studies so far, future studies should use a standardized methodology, external validation, and an interpretable broader input variable.

Indexed as

inflammatory bowel diseaseMachine learningmonitoringresponsetreatment

Identifiers

PMID41868868
PMCPMC13004820

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.