ReviewRevista panamericana de salud publica = Pan American journal of public health2026
Scoping review of evidence on front-of-pack warning labels and nutrition and health variables in Peru.
Review in Revista panamericana de salud publica = Pan American journal of public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Systematic review of impact of mandatory front-of-package nutrition labeling on behavioral and cognitive outcomes and inequalities.Revista panamericana de salud publica = Pan American journal of public health · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Front-of-pack labeling (FOPL) was implemented in Peru as a national prevention strategy, but little is known about its evaluation, impact, or effectiveness in nutrition and health. This scoping review shows the evidence on front-of-pack warning labels and nutrition and health variables in Peru. Methods: The search was conducted (September 2024 and June 2025) through electronic databases (MEDLINE, SciELO, CAB abstracts, FSTA, Scopus) and gray literature (VHL Regional Portal, ProQuest) on any FOPL study (any study design and setting) in Peru, complemented by a hand search of local theses. Results: In total, 287 records were identified and 55 studies were included (15 peer-reviewed and 40 theses). Most studies were cross-sectional surveys among adults in Lima on FOPL awareness, attitudes, knowledge, purchase intention, and food consumption. A majority of studies reporting on attitudes ( Conclusion: This review generally found high FOPL awareness and perceptions. Half of the studies showed a strong understanding and use of FOPL for purchasing decisions, and reported no change in the consumption of FOPL products in adults from Lima. More studies with stronger designs are needed to better understand the impact of FOPL on health outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.