ArticleFrontiers in psychiatry2026
Dynamics of psychological distress: understanding the impact of intraindividual and interindividual factors in the Belgian population during the COVID-19 pandemic-a multilevel prospective cohort study.
Article in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
20 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Longitudinal studies have identified an increase in psychological distress throughout the general population during the COVID-19 pandemic. Nevertheless, the determinants of the variation in psychological distress are unclear. This paper investigated factors that were likely to be associated with psychological distress variation: exposure to COVID-19 and psychosocial factors. Methods: Five waves of a prospective cohort survey were conducted with a convenience sample of the general population in Belgium between March 2020 and November 2021 (n=4,550). Psychological distress was measured using the GHQ-12. Two groups of exposures were investigated: self-reported exposure to COVID-19 and psychosocial factors (loneliness, social support, and social activities). We first partitioned the variance into an interindividual component (time-invariant) and an intraindividual component (time-variant). Linear mixed models were used for analysis. Results: Most of the variance in psychological distress was interindividual. For both sources of variance (interindividual and intraindividual), the change in psychological distress was mainly associated with psychosocial factors, rather than pandemic-related factors. Loneliness emerged as the factor most strongly associated both with interindividual and intraindividual differences in psychological distress. Discussion: Overall, these findings suggest that the variation in psychological distress between the waves was mostly influenced by social support, loneliness, and social activities, rather than by exposure to COVID-19. Mitigation policies aimed at controlling the pandemic should focus more on addressing specific individual psychosocial vulnerabilities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.