ArticleJournal of arrhythmia2025
Zero Fluoroscopy Ablation of Arrhythmias in Patients With Congenital Heart Disease.
Article in Journal of arrhythmia, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Zero Fluoroscopy Radiofrequency Slow-Pathway Modification for AVNRT in Patients ≤ 21 Years: A Single-Center Cohort and Contextual Review of Literature.Journal of arrhythmia · 2026Article
- Zero Fluoroscopy Ablation of Arrhythmias in Patients With Congenital Heart Disease.Journal of arrhythmia · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aims: Radiation-free catheter ablation is feasible with modern electroanatomic mapping systems. We aimed to evaluate the feasibility, safety, and outcomes of non-fluoroscopic ablation (NFA) in patients with congenital heart disease (CHD). Methods: We retrospectively reviewed CHD patients who underwent NFA between November 2016 and January 2025. All procedures were performed using the CARTO 3D electroanatomic mapping system. Atrial, ventricular, and aortic geometries were reconstructed as needed. Catheter navigation and sheath placement were guided without fluoroscopy; intracardiac echocardiography was used selectively. Results: Forty-two patients (23 females) with CHD underwent NFA. The median age was 14 years (range 4-56), and median weight was 55 kg (range 19-145). Twenty-one patients had mild, 16 moderate complexity and 5 great complexity CHD. Arrhythmia mechanisms included AVNRT (14%), manifest WPW (21%), high-risk WPW without SVT (5%), concealed pathway AVRT (26%), AFL (12%), AT (14%), and VT (7%). Two patients had both AVNRT and AVRT. Acute success was achieved in all cases without fluoroscopy or acute complications. Over a median 48-month follow-up, three patients had recurrences: one with WPW and Ebstein anomaly, one with ASD/PLSVC and concealed pathway, and one with dual arrhythmia substrates. Conclusion: Zero-fluoroscopy ablation of arrhythmias in select patients with mild moderate or great complexity CHD is feasible, safe, and effective, offering high acute success and low recurrence while eliminating radiation exposure.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.