ArticleJournal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions2026
Prediction of Serious Adverse Events Associated With Pediatric Cardiac Catheterizations: External Model Validation of the CRISP Scoring Method.
Article in Journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: A methodology for predicting pediatric cardiac catheterization-related complications can assist interventionists in planning treatment strategies, obtaining informed consent, and allocating medical resources. We aimed to perform an external validation of the Catheterization Risk Score for Pediatrics (CRISP). Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 3093 consecutive catheterizations performed between January 2016 and March 2021 to calculate the CRISP. Model performance was assessed using discrimination (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve [AUC]) and calibration (observed and predicted risk). Results: Serious adverse events (SAE) occurred in 200 procedures (6.5%, 208 events). The most frequent complication was arterial occlusive thrombosis at the access site (1.8%). Nine catheterization-related deaths were identified. The mean CRISP score was 5.74 ± 3.43. SAE incidence increased across categories, ranging from 1.5% in category 1 to 36.4% in category 5. The CRISP score and categories demonstrated good discriminative power (AUC, 0.729; 95% CI, 0.695-0.764; AUC, 0.717, 95% CI, 0.682-0.752). Conclusions: The CRISP scoring method demonstrated good predictive performance in identifying SAE. This external validation supports procedural planning and may improve communication with patients and families, thereby enhancing safety and quality of care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.