ReviewJournal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions2026
Angiography-Derived Physiology for Coronary Artery Disease Assessment: Expert Opinion From a SCAI Roundtable.
Review in Journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Murray law-based quantitative flow ratio for functional assessment of coronary lesions: a systematic review and meta-analysis.The international journal of cardiovascular imaging · 2026Pooled it
- The Contemporary Role of Intracoronary Physiological Assessment: Fractional Flow Reserve, Non-Hyperemic Pressure Ratios, Wireless Technologies, and Microcirculation.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2026Review
- Angiography-derived physiology versus pressure wire-based fractional flow reserve for coronary revascularization guidance: A systematic review and meta-analysis.JRSM cardiovascular diseaseReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Angiography-derived physiology (ADP) is an emerging technique that offers streamlined, wire-free assessment of epicardial coronary physiology. This is accomplished by applying computational fluid dynamics or, in some cases, mathematical formulas in conjunction with artificial intelligence to standard coronary angiographic images. This approach represents a potential paradigm shift in the catheterization laboratory workflow. Despite its early promise, obstacles to the adoption and routine use of ADP remain. This document represents expert opinion from a scientific roundtable on ADP for coronary artery assessment sponsored by the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions. It provides a comprehensive overview of the underlying concepts of ADP, outlines its optimal clinical application based on current evidence, highlights key advantages and limitations, reviews available software solutions, and discusses future directions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.