Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41868746›Full record

ArticleResearch and reports in urology2026

Enhancing Percutaneous Access: The «GENOA» Prone Modified Position.

Guglielmo Mantica, Marco Martiriggiano, Raquel Diaz, Enrico Vecchio, Lorenzo Lo Monaco, Giorgia Granelli, Benedetta Col, Francesca Ambrosini, Federica Balzarini, Rafaela Malinaric and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Research and reports in urology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Guglielmo ManticaDepartment of Urology, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, University of Genova, Genova, Italy.
Marco MartiriggianoDepartment of Urology, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, University of Genova, Genova, Italy.
Raquel DiazDepartment of Surgical and Diagnostic Integrated Sciences (DISC), University of Genova, Genova, Italy.
Enrico VecchioDepartment of Urology, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, University of Genova, Genova, Italy.
Lorenzo Lo MonacoDepartment of Urology, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, University of Genova, Genova, Italy.
Giorgia GranelliDepartment of Urology, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, University of Genova, Genova, Italy.
Benedetta ColDepartment of Urology, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, University of Genova, Genova, Italy.
Francesca AmbrosiniDepartment of Urology, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, University of Genova, Genova, Italy.
Federica BalzariniDepartment of Urology, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, University of Genova, Genova, Italy.
Rafaela MalinaricDepartment of Urology, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, University of Genova, Genova, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-1158-6946
Daniele PanarelloDepartment of Urology, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, University of Genova, Genova, Italy.
Carlo TerroneDepartment of Urology, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, University of Genova, Genova, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) is the preferred treatment for large or complex renal stones, but the optimal patient positioning remains debated. While the traditional prone position offers excellent access to posterior calyces, it can limit ventilation and increase anesthetic complexity. Supine modifications improve airway management but may reduce access efficacy. We propose the "GENOA" Prone Modified Position, a novel setup combining the advantages of both approaches. In this preliminary study, three patients underwent PCNL using this technique, which involves prone positioning with a ~30-45° rotation obtained by placing gel pads under the thoracic and abdominal regions contralateral to the affected kidney. This alignment brings the renal axis parallel to the floor, facilitating a safer and more ergonomic puncture. All punctures were performed below the costal margin, accessing the lower calyces in four of six renal units. Mean operative time was 72.2 minutes, and two patients achieved complete stone clearance. No complications or opioid use were recorded, and the average hospital stay was 4.3 days. The GENOA Prone Modified Position appears to be a feasible and effective solution that enhances access to posterior calyces while minimizing ventilatory risk. Further studies are needed to validate its reproducibility and long-term benefits in larger cohorts.

Indexed as

kidney stonesPCNLprone PCNstaghorn stonesurolithiasis

Identifiers

PMID41868746
PMCPMC13005184

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.