ArticleOrthopedic reviews2026
Fractured Truths: A Collected Review of Modern Insights on Femoral Neck Fracture Management.
Article in Orthopedic reviews, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Femoral neck fractures (FNFs) remain one of the most devastating injuries in adult patients, associated with a high morbidity, mortality and economic burden worldwide. The global incidence of hip fractures exceeds 1.6 million annually and is projected to rise to between 4.5 and 6.5 million by 2050. FNFs account for approximately 50% of all hip fractures and are strongly associated with aging, osteoporosis and frailty. Mortality rates remain high, approaching 10% within the first month and up to 36% within one year of injury. While displaced FNFs are widely managed with arthroplasty, the role of internal fixation (IF) in minimally displaced fractures is controversial, particularly in the context of emerging evidence highlighting high significant reoperation rates after fixation. Current treatment pathways must balance functional recovery, risk of complications such as dislocation, periprosthetic fracture and infection with long-term implant survivorship. Evolving strategies include utilising dual mobility (DM) total hip arthroplasty (THA) to mitigate instability and registry-based comparisons that refine patient selection criteria for hemiarthroplasty (HA) versus THA. Classification systems such as Garden, Pauwels, and AO/OTA remain central to guiding treatment, though their reliability is limited, and simplified displaced/undisplaced categorization improves interobserver agreement. This review synthesises contemporary evidence across epidemiology, surgical timing, classification, fixation versus arthroplasty, innovations in implant design, complications, outcomes, and policy implications, integrating registry analyses, randomised trials, and systematic reviews.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.