ArticleFrontiers in veterinary science2025
The burden of disease in Swiss pork production.
Article in Frontiers in veterinary science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Disease negatively affects the health and productivity of animals, reducing the efficiency and profitability of the livestock sector. Quantifying disease burden in livestock is important to allow appropriate prioritization of diseases and resource allocation in animal health. Although previous studies have quantified costs due to single causes of disease, a consistent approach to estimating total disease costs and comparing them across a wide range of livestock species and production systems was lacking. The development of the Animal Health Loss Envelope (AHLE) metric within the Global Burden of Animals Diseases (GBADs) programme aimed to address these gaps. In this study, we estimate the impacts of improved health status on pig demographics, and estimate the burden due to all causes of disease (the AHLE) for Swiss pork production. Methods: Using data from the industry, literature and national databases, a demographic model for Swiss pork production was developed, and gross margin analysis was conducted for production scenarios, including current average conditions in Switzerland, and a simulated, disease-free, Ideal scenario. Results: We estimated that in absence of disease, 41% fewer sows, 3.5% fewer weaned piglets, and 1.5% fewer reared piglets would be required to produce the same number of slaughter pigs compared to current average production. Gross margins were estimated at CHF 469 per breeding sow and CHF 18 per slaughter pig produced under current average production (CHF1: US$1.25). In the absence of disease, gross margins were predicted to increase by CHF 1,856 per sow and CHF 29 per slaughter pig, compared to current average production. Total population AHLE was valued at CHF 461 million, with CHF 187 million attributable to breeding/rearing and CHF 274 million attributable to fattening. Discussion: These results support that disease significantly impacts production efficiency in Swiss pork, with possible environmental knock-on effects (e.g., through increased feed-demand and farm waste production), and animal welfare impacts. The total population burden of disease estimated here, equal to around half of the total production value of Swiss pork, is significant. Further research should focus on attribution of disease burden to individual causes, framed within this overall AHLE estimate, allowing prioritization of diseases for management and control.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.