ArticleNeurobiology of stress2026
Mathematical modeling of the cortisol stress response to develop indicators that are applicable across studies.
Article in Neurobiology of stress, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Growing interest in interindividual differences in stress neuroendocrinology has created a need to combine data from multiple laboratory acute stress induction studies to allow large-scale individual participant data (IPD) meta-analyses. However, established cortisol stress response indicators such as area under the curve (AUC) are inherently affected by sampling timing and duration, although to what extent remains unknown. Here, we leveraged a large, combined dataset (STRESS-EU; n = 1295) to develop novel model-based indicators that can accommodate variability in sampling schedules. These were based on modeled individual response curves that achieve full data inter- and extrapolation. We validated this method with simulated and independent data. Crucially, combined data simulations particularly showed higher accuracy for model-based versus conventional 'observation-based' AUC indicators with variability in sampling duration. In conclusion, our novel method harmonizes cortisol response indicator estimates for combined data, yielding opportunities for IPD meta-analyses of acute stress test studies that could greatly advance the field.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.