ArticleClinical optometry2026
A Predictive Model for Personalized Fitting of Peripheral Defocus Spectacles Based on Ocular Biometric Parameters.
Article in Clinical optometry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: To construct a predictive model for personalized recommendation of peripheral defocus spectacle designs based on ocular biometric parameters. Methods: This retrospective cohort study included 2824 myopic children who wore peripheral defocus spectacles at the Ophthalmology Center of Peking University People's Hospital. Participants were divided into five groups according to the spectacle designs (Diversified Segmental Defocus Optimization [DSDO], Diffusion Optics Technology [DOT], Defocus Induced Multiple Segment [DIMS], Highly Aspherical Lenslets [HALT], Hexagon Optimized Reticular Integration [HORI]) and matched for gender, age, and baseline biometric parameters. The dataset was randomly split into training (80%) and validation (20%) sets for model evaluation. Separate multiple linear regression prediction models based on ocular biometric parameters were constructed for each designs. Finally, an R language function was developed for clinical personalized recommendation. Results: After matching baseline parameters, no statistically significant difference was observed in axial elongation control efficacy among the five peripheral defocus spectacles designs (P = 0.28). The coefficient of determination (R Conclusion: Although no significant differences in average efficacy were observed among the five designs, this study successfully established predictive models based on ocular biometric parameters to guide personalized fitting of peripheral defocus spectacles.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.