ArticleJSAMS plus2023
Head acceleration during impacts on snow: evaluation of a ski helmet.
Article in JSAMS plus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: Current standards require ski helmets to meet acceleration criteria during impacts to a rigid surface, but do not require helmets to be evaluated for head impacts to snow, which is a common cause of traumatic brain injury in skiing and snowboarding. The objective of this study is to measure head linear acceleration during impacts to snow, with and without a ski helmet. Methods: A portable test bench was developed and used to perform drop test of an instrumented headform onto groomed ski slopes. Impacts were made on the top of the head with and without a helmet, at three speeds (5.3 m/s, 6.1 m/s, 7.5 m/s) and on three types of snow (soft, hard, very hard). Head linear acceleration, HIC, snow hardness, and penetration of the head into the snow were recorded. Statistical analysis was performed using factorial ANOVAs. Results: 96 impacts were performed. The mean peak head linear acceleration was 51G (±6G), 106G (±29G), and 170G (±27G) on soft, hard, and very hard snow, respectively, at 6.1 m/s. Head acceleration and HIC exceeded published thresholds for concussion and skull fracture in 85 and 28 impacts respectively. Head linear acceleration significantly increased with impact speed ( Conclusions: Helmet use did not significantly reduce head linear acceleration for the snow conditions tested. The study suggests that head-snow impact characteristics should be considered in the design and evaluation of future helmets.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.