Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41868558›Full record

ArticleJSAMS plus2023

Helmet use in skiing and snowboarding in Switzerland during the past 20 years.

S Niemann, F Bürgi, O Brügger

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JSAMS plus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

S NiemannSwiss Council for Accident Prevention (BFU), Hodlerstrasse 5a, Bern 3011, Switzerland.
F BürgiSwiss Council for Accident Prevention (BFU), Hodlerstrasse 5a, Bern 3011, Switzerland.
O BrüggerSwiss Council for Accident Prevention (BFU), Hodlerstrasse 5a, Bern 3011, Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: The aim of this study was to quantify helmet use in skiing and snowboarding in Switzerland. Design: Regular cross-sectional surveys of skiers and snowboarders were conducted on Swiss slopes from the 2002/2003 to the 2021/2022 seasons. Method: Surveys included information on helmet use, sport, gender, age, skill level, and country of residence. Data from 15 single surveys were used to trace the evolution of helmet use in Switzerland. A logistic regression on data from the most recent survey was conducted to detect differences in helmet use among demographic groups. Results: In the 2002/2003 season, 14% of skiers (95% confidence interval [CI] ​= ​12%-18%) and 20% of snowboarders (CI 16%-26%) used a helmet. By the most recent season (2021/2022), wearing rates for both skiers and snowboarders had increased significantly (skiers: 95% [CI 93%-97%]; snowboarders: 92% [CI 89%-95%]). The regression results showed that skiers, females, younger people, and people in the German-speaking part of Switzerland were more likely to wear a helmet. Conclusions: The results show an impressive evolution of helmet use rates among skiers and snowboarders since the 2002/2003 season. Steep differences detected in earlier seasons have leveled out, and most people on the slopes today wear helmets. Nevertheless, the ongoing efforts for promoting helmet use should be maintained.

Indexed as

Epidemiological monitoringHead protective devicesRisk behaviorSkiingSnowboarding

Identifiers

PMID41868558
PMCPMC12980622

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.