Comparison of selected exercise training modalities in the management of PCOS: A systematic review and meta-analysis to inform evidence-based guidelines.

Background: Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) is a common endocrine condition in women of reproductive age that often presents with reproductive, metabolic, and psychological symptoms. While exercise is part of the management of PCOS, it is unclear which form of exercise may be most effective and for which outcomes. Aim: In order to inform the updated 2023 International evidence-based guideline for the assessment and management of polycystic ovary syndrome, this systematic review aimed to determine the exercise modality that provides the greatest improvement in anthropometric, metabolic, hormonal/reproductive, and psychological outcomes in adult women with PCOS. Methods: Five databases were searched from inception to July 2022. Studies eligible for inclusion consisted of those in a PCOS population, that compared two exercise modalities, and reported at least one anthropometric, metabolic, hormonal/reproductive, and/or psychological outcome. Screening, data extraction, and methodological quality assessments were conducted by two independent reviewers. Methodological quality assessment was performed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool and the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) guidelines were used to determine the certainty of evidence. Meta-analysis was performed utilising Comprehensive Meta-Analysis software, Version 3. Results: Of the 4739 records identified, five unique studies were eligible for inclusion in the systematic review and meta-analysis, comprising a total of 216 individuals. Meta-analyses comparing high-intensity interval training (HIIT) to moderate-intensity continuous training (MICT) on anthropometric, metabolic, and hormonal/reproductive parameters found no statistically significant differences in outcomes between groups, and the certainty of evidence was graded as low or very low. Results from single studies showed that HIIT was more effective than MICT for menstrual regularity (odds ratio [95% confidence interval] ​= ​7.875 [1.105, 56.125], p ​= ​0.039, very low certainty). HIIT vs resistance training, and diet ​+ ​MICT vs diet ​+ ​MICT ​+ ​resistance training were examined by a single study each, and no statistically significant differences were found for any outcome, with the certainty of evidence ranked as very low. Conclusion: To date, there are insufficient RCTs comparing exercise modalities in individuals with PCOS to establish with certainty whether one form of exercise is superior to another for the management of PCOS.