ArticleFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology2026
Development of a shoulder muscle feedback controller for human body models.
Article in Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: State-of-the-art finite element human body models (FE HBMs) with active muscle controllers can predict occupant kinematics during braking and steering, which are typical pre-crash interventions aiming at avoiding crashes. Information about the pre-crash occupant kinematics can be used in the design of systems that influence the occupant position in the pre-crash phase and the interaction between the occupant and the restraints in both the pre- and in-crash phases. For driver HBMs, active shoulder muscles are required to reproduce the load between the steering wheel and the torso. The shoulder is the most freely moving joint in the body, and the stability of the shoulder complex depends on muscle activity. Thus, intermuscular load sharing cannot be determined solely from the geometrical location of the muscle because other muscles co-contract to maintain stability during the movement. The aims of this study were to implement a new controller, which introduces load sharing based on physical tests with volunteers, into the shoulder of an FE-HBM and to compare its performance with that of volunteers subjected to dynamic elbow loading. Methods: A new shoulder muscle controller for use in FE-HBMs was developed, including directionally dependent intermuscular load sharing based on recorded muscle activity from volunteers. The controller performance was evaluated by simulating a volunteer experiment, exposing the subjects to dynamic loading of their elbow in eight directions. Results: Elbow kinematics were compared between the model and volunteers. A sensitivity study was also performed to evaluate the controller gains. The model successfully predicted peak elbow displacements for all loading directions. Discussion: One limitation in the current study was the use of a submodel and a simplified experimental setup. In a braking or steering maneuver, head and torso inertia would introduce forces to the shoulder, instead of forces introduced in the elbow as in this study. Because these two scenarios are mechanically similar, a simplified approach was used instead, as this allowed for an experiment where the force magnitude and direction could be easily controlled. Hence, the developed shoulder muscle controller is ready to be implemented and evaluated in a full-body active FE-HBM exposed to driver maneuvers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.