ArticleJournal of asthma and allergy2026
Management of People with Asthma in Primary Care by Smoking Status: A Cohort Study.
Article in Journal of asthma and allergy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Previous studies suggest that cigarette smokers with chronic respiratory disease may be managed differently. However, evidence is limited on whether smoking status impacts asthma management. Methods: Data from the UK Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD) Aurum were used to define a cohort of adults (aged over 18) diagnosed with asthma between January 1, 2010, and March 31, 2021. Start of follow-up was defined at first recorded asthma diagnosis. End of follow-up was March 31, 2021, or earlier if patients died or left the general practice. The exposure was the most recently recorded cigarette smoking status prior to asthma diagnosis, categorised as never, ex, or current smokers. Two outcome measures were used to assess asthma management: i) a record of at least one inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) prescription in the first year of follow-up and ii) asthma annual review visits over the follow-up period. Logistic and negative binomial regression models were applied, respectively, adjusting for potential confounders. An interaction with sex was tested to account for differences in asthma management in males and females. Results: Among 241,624 adults with asthma (59.6% female, mean age 50.8), current smokers were less likely to receive ICS than never smokers (OR 0.94, 95% CI 0.91-0.96), while ex-smokers were more likely (OR 1.09, 95% CI 1.07-1.11). A sex interaction showed males were less likely to receive ICS than females among never smokers. Current smokers also had lower annual review rates (IRR 0.83, 95% CI 0.82-0.84), whereas ex-smokers had rates similar to never smokers (IRR 0.99, 95% CI 0.98-1.00). Males had lower review rates than females among never smokers only. Conclusion: Cigarette smoking status influences asthma management. Findings highlight the importance of considering smoking status in planning and tailoring asthma care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.