Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41868490›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neurology

Impact of blood pressure levels and variability after successful revascularization on the prognosis in ICAS-LVOS patients.

Yimeng Liu, Hui Zhang, Qiang Dong, Wenjie Cao

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neurology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Yimeng Liu *Department of Neurology, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Hui Zhang *Department of Neurology, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Qiang DongDepartment of Neurology, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Wenjie CaoDepartment of Neurology, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Optimal blood pressure management after endovascular treatment (EVT) for intracranial atherosclerosis-related large vessel occlusion stroke (ICAS-LVOS) remains uncertain. This study evaluated the impact of systolic blood pressure (SBP) and blood pressure variability (BPV) on early outcomes following successful recanalization. Methods: We prospectively enrolled 110 ICAS-LVOS patients (Jan 2020-Dec 2024). Hourly SBP was recorded for 24 h post-EVT. BPV metrics included standard deviation (SD), coefficient of variation (CV), average real variability (ARV), and fluctuation frequency (|∆SBP| ≥ 10 mmHg). Outcomes included early favorable prognosis [National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) ≤ 7], early neurological deterioration (ΔNIHSS ≥ + 2), and hemorrhagic transformation (HT). Results: 110 patients were recruited. Generalized estimating equation analyses demonstrated that higher hourly SBP levels and higher |∆SBP| showed an associated with a decreased likelihood of NIHSS ≤ 7 and an increased risk of ΔNIHSS ≥ + 2. Logistic regression confirmed that lower mean SBP ( Conclusion: Higher post-EVT SBP levels and greater SBP variability were associated with reduced early recovery and an increased risk of neurological deterioration in ICAS-LVOS. Blood pressure should be maintained at a relatively low, consistent level.

Indexed as

blood pressure variabilityendovascular treatmentintracranial atherosclerotic stenosislarge-vessel occlusive strokeprognosissystolic blood pressure

Identifiers

PMID41868490
PMCPMC12999924

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.